In the post differences of differences, I make an observation that
if you keep taking the differences of consecutive square numbers,
cube numbers and fourth powers, you will eventually get a line of
numbers which are exactly the same. I had said that the repeating
number would be the exponent's factorial and that was the case up
to 5. I didn't know why this happened, but I think I've found out:
If you write out the line of numbers algebraically and do the
subtraction, then you get a clear (oh really?) answer.
SIDE NOTE: My maths teacher is really insistent on me writing
complete answers with statements, so here goes:
So, the first line is No, with statements.
Let the exponent = k
Therefore,
1st line - 1k, 2k, 3k, 4k, 5k, 6k, 7k and so on...
2nd line - 2k-1k, 3k-2k, 4k-3k, 5k-4k and so on...
3rd line - 3k-2(2k)+1k, 4k-2(3k)+2k, 5k-2(4k)+3k and so on...
.
.
.
kth line - immensely complex maths-stuff
After working for 30 minutes on this, I felt that the effort
required to create a solution was not worth it. Therefore,
I leave it as an open problem.
if you keep taking the differences of consecutive square numbers,
cube numbers and fourth powers, you will eventually get a line of
numbers which are exactly the same. I had said that the repeating
number would be the exponent's factorial and that was the case up
to 5. I didn't know why this happened, but I think I've found out:
If you write out the line of numbers algebraically and do the
subtraction, then you get a clear (oh really?) answer.
SIDE NOTE: My maths teacher is really insistent on me writing
complete answers with statements, so here goes:
Let the exponent = k
Therefore,
1st line - 1k, 2k, 3k, 4k, 5k, 6k, 7k and so on...
2nd line - 2k-1k, 3k-2k, 4k-3k, 5k-4k and so on...
3rd line - 3k-2(2k)+1k, 4k-2(3k)+2k, 5k-2(4k)+3k and so on...
.
.
.
kth line - immensely complex maths-stuff
After working for 30 minutes on this, I felt that the effort
required to create a solution was not worth it. Therefore,
I leave it as an open problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment